table of contents
 
 
SUSTAINABLE URBAN LANDSCAPES
The Brentwood Design Charrette
APPENDICES  
 

2    THE DESIGN BRIEF 
3    DESIGN CHARRETTE ADVISORY BOARD 
4    DESIGN CHARRETTE TEAM LEADERS 

1    DESIGN PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

  • Land and Water 
  • The Built Environment 
  • Public Transit 
  • Energy Use 
  •   
    The emerging local, provincial and  federal policies for sustainable development provide the basis for the following performance criteria. Major sources used by the charrette organizers to arrive at these performance criteria include: The British Columbia Energy Council, Planning Today for Tomorrow’s Energy: An Energy Strategy for British Columbia (BCEC); BC Hydro, Bringing Electricity to the Livable Region (BCH); The City of Vancouver, Clouds of Change, Final Report of the City of Vancouver Task Force on Atmospheric Change (CV); The Commission of Resources and Environment: Finding Common Ground: A Shared Vision for Land Use in British Columbia (CORE); The Province of British Columbia: Municipal Act Section 942 and Section 945 (Growth Management Legislation) (MA); The Greater Vancouver Regional District: Livable Region Strategic Plan (LRSP); BC Transit, Transit and Land Use Planning (BCT); Official Community Plan for Burnaby British Columbia (BOCP); Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan (BTCP); The Nature of Burnaby: An Environmentally Sensitive Areas Strategy, Draft (ESA); In Transit. People Moving People (IT); Light Rail Transit and Growth Management in Vancouver, BC, Canada (LRT); A Long-Range Transportation Plan for Greater Vancouver (LTP); Managing Greater Vancouver’s Growth (MGVG); Northeast Light Rail Transit Service Plan Concepts, Draft (NLRT); The State of the Environment Report for Burnaby (SOER); The Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan (TCP); Transit and Land Use Planning (TLUP); Best Management Practices Plan for Still Creek in the Brunette Watershed, Final Report (WBMP); Still Creek – Brunette Basin Issues and Proposed Actions, Draft Report (WSCBB); Water quality and Stormwater Contaminants in the Brunette River Watershed, British Columbia, 1994/95, Final Report (WWQ). These reports and regulations were available for each team’s reference.

    Policy directives included in these reports that have an obvious impact on site and community design have been converted into design performance criteria and are listed below in three categories: land and water, the built environment, and energy use. These criteria all support the goal of more sustainable neighbourhoods and communities; however, they are often contradictory when applied. For example, increasing housing density may negatively affect ground and surface water quality. These performance criteria should provide designers with a basic framework for design. Participants are encouraged to interpret and expand on these policies via the production of a specific design for the site. Each team’s design for the site must reflect a clear vision for the district within the larger plan for the future of Burnaby.

    Land and Water 
    The goal of British Columbian and Canadian public policy is to protect the ecological integrity of our land and rivers, both for their intrinsic value and for their value to present and future citizens. The charrette organizers assume that urban development that protects the ecological integrity of the land and water must start “from the ground up.” The ecological health of the region is dependent on the ecological health of the sites that make up the region. For example, degraded stormwater (non-point source pollution) shipped “off sites” into streams and tributaries, is the major threat to the health of Georgia Basin salmon streams. The charrette site constitutes a significant portion of the Brunette River watershed. The relatively slow moving Still Creek is the primary threat to this system. Water quality and habitat capability of the Brunette system have been seriously degraded. For these and other reasons, the site can be considered very sensitive to development. Our challenge is to invent an infrastructure of bioremediation that includes streets and public spaces and that serves a number of ecological functions. These functions include: remediating the down-stream consequences of increased urbanization, adding amenity and recreational value to the public realm; and saving money when compared to conventional infrastructure. The following points should be considered carefully within all design proposals.
    Back 
      

    1. Infrastructure  
    Propose new types of public infrastructure capable of bio-remediating urban pollution as close as possible to its source. Integrate stormwater best management practices into the fabric of the urban infrastructure. Maximize any recreational and/or aesthetic possibilities that emerge as a result. Maximize the impacts of infrastructure expenditures by building in recreation, multi-modal transportation, ecological enhancement, and bioremediation functions into the system. Do so in ways that cost less than conventional single function infrastructure. Integrate water quality BMP designs for this purpose.1 

    2. Environmental Protection  
    Protect and enhance all environmentally sensitive and/or degraded areas (i.e., wetlands, watercourses, ravines, and watersheds, groundwater recharge areas, critical wildlife habitat areas, and areas with fragile or unstable soils) while maintaining and/or enhancing the ecological performance of native habitats, hydrology, and landforms.2  

    3. Open Space Linkage 
    Preserve, create, and link urban and rural open space, including parks and recreation areas. Maintain and enhance public access to streams, where environmentally sustainable.3  

    4. Open Space Quality  
    Identify and enhance spatial recreation opportunities within the site, (i.e., streams, topographic features, natural areas etc.) 4 

    5.  Sanitary Systems 
    Consider the integration of district sewage treatment and sewage treatment marshes.5

      
    The Built Environment 
    The goal of British Columbian and Canadian public policy is to provide adequate, affordable, and appropriate housing for all citizens. A more sustainable site and community design must integrate, not segregate, land uses, income groups, and family types. Services and jobs must be located near homes and transit. The Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan integrates land uses placing housing close to commercial services, jobs, and transit. Ways of integrating various economic strata within the community have not yet been determined and need to be explored.
    The Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan proposes accommodating 9300 residential units on the 250 acres (figure does not include rights-of-ways) that will eventually be residential or mixed use residential, for an average residential density on these lands of roughly 30 units per acre. Approximately half of these units are proposed to be high density with the remaining half to be medium density. No single family dwelling zones (or zones of detached single family areas) are suggested, although the surrounding area is dominated by this use. Regional policy encourages accomodating the bulk of new population in “ground-oriented housing.”6 Ground-oriented housing is defined as housing where each unit has its own access to the street or a public/semi public exterior realm. Sensitive architectural approaches are needed for this type of housing. The present market is dominated by a small handful of project types. Many of the larger projects in this category are organized to the interior of the site, draining adjacent streets of activity and promoting a walled off quality for the project. Often this result is the unintended consequence of otherwise legitimate traffic safety concerns (such as restricting the number of curb cuts on new projects to one or two). The relationship between the regulatory framework, traffic safety concerns, subdivision regulations, and market forces is not well understood. The Charrette will hopefully produce an expanded palette of project types for this burgeoning new market by striking a balance between urban design considerations and regulatory conventions. Accordingly, each design should reflect the following points.
    Back
      
    1. Housing Equity  
    Provide a balance of housing types that meet the needs of a range of ages and lifestyles and are affordable to groups and individuals within a wide range of incomes. At least 20 percent (a minimum of 720 units if 10,000 persons inhabit the site) of the housing shall be for persons with family incomes in the bottom third. Income statistics for Burnaby residents are listed in 
    the appendix.7  

    2. Special Needs Housing  
    Provide adequate special needs housing for seniors, disabled, family crisis victims, etc. as per Burnaby demographic information.8  

    3. Safety  
    Employ proven methods of enhancing community safety and sociability.9  

    4. Jobs  
    Provide work space in commercial, office, or light industrial facilities for the working population at a rate of one job for every dwelling unit. We are assuming 350 workspaces will be required for each 1,000 residents.10 

    5. Housing Types  
    Expand the palette of ground oriented housing types. Housing should enhance, not take away from, life on the street. Suggest strategies for parcelization that would promote diversity and enhance street vitality. Examine ways of handling car arrival that will not detract from street life.11 

      

    Public Transit 
    The goal of British Columbian and Canadian public policy is to provide inexpensive, convenient, fast, and frequent public transit for as many of its citizens as possible. In this way dependence on the private automobile can be stabilized and then reduced. Environmental goals cannot be achieved if the rate of auto dependence is not reversed. Public expenditures for auto-related infrastructure would soon be out of control. The Brentwood Town Centre will be served by a light rail line that will connect the Broadway Corridor in Vancouver to the City of Coquitlam. The Brentwood Town Centre lies roughly at the halfway point of this proposed line. There are many North American cities where light rail transit enhances the livability of the districts through which it passes. However, fitting light rail transit into the Brentwood Town Centre in a way that enhances community life is a challenge. The Lougheed Highway right-of-way must somehow include the rail line while still handling four lanes of inter-urban traffic. The intersection of Lougheed and Willingdon is already highly congested and likely to get worse before regional transit improvements have any impact. The existing right-of-way is already an imposing barrier for pedestrians and cyclists. Design teams should give special attention to these important issues and consider the following in their designs.
    Back
      

    1. Access to Transit  
    All residents of the new Brentwood district will live within an easy walk to transit. Examine ways of connecting pedestrians and bikes to transit nodes that further enhance access and convenience of transit for residents. Examine ways of connecting residential districts that lie outside the site to major transit nodes. 12  

    2. Multi-modal Movement to Transit Nodes  
    Provide safe, comfortable, barrier-free and direct pedestrian access to the transit route. Provide a multi-modal circulation system that gives walking and biking priority over automobile travel. 13 

      
    Energy Use 
    The goal of British Columbian and Canadian public policy is to reduce energy consumption (and the pollution that this consumption causes) even while population continues to increase. Any progress toward a more sustainable future will require large per capita reductions in the amount of energy required for building construction and transportation. Many of the gains to be made in this area lie in the realm of improved building technologies and improved vehicle efficiencies, and are thus outside the scope of this site and community design demonstration project (except for energy benefits accruing from increased use of transit). However, certain site and community design factors can powerfully affect the amount of energy required for building conditioning and transportation.
    District heating can be practical at certain densities and site configurations. Solar access for winter warmth is significant in our region, where the coldest winter days tend also to be the sunniest (the site has a most favourable aspect for solar heating). West facing dwelling units (with the large expanses of glass common in our region) require summer air condition – even though our summers are quite cool. Urban forests can significantly influence energy use. Charrette participants are challenged to design the site with due regard for climatic imperatives.

    Integrating land uses and accommodating pedestrians and bicycles saves energy. Designers should show how pedestrians and bicycles are accommodated and how destinations are located within walking distance of services, transit, and jobs.
    Back
      

    1. Solar Heat  
    Reduce building energy re quirements by providing optimal solar orientation, solar access, passive solar heating, and day-lighting. 14  

    2. Energy Infrastructure  
    Aim for the efficient use of utility infrastructure by considering utility system design as part of the community design. Consider the possibility of natural on-site sewage treatment. 15  

    3. Alternative Energy  
    Provide as appropriate (or maintain flexibility to provide in the future)  energy service from alternative technologies such as community scale generating systems, district heating and co-generation. 16  

    4. Design with Climate  
    Enhance community microclimate through design response to wind, sum, vegetation, and precipitation. 17 

      
    2    THE DESIGN BRIEF 

    This design brief should be the basis for your proposals. The charrette organizers have made every effort to ensure that the brief will promote comparability between the different teams without limiting your design discretion and expression.

    The plan you propose will take up to thirty years to carry out. During that time, land ownership and land tenure will naturally turn over to the land uses delineated in the Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan. You should assume that most existing site infrastructure (i.e. streets [except Lougheed Highway] bridges, sewer lines, etc.) would need reconstruction during this period, and could be realigned or reconfigured in conformance with your proposals if there were a compelling reason to do so.

    Each team should determine the choice and relative proportion of dwelling types. The Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan calls for 9,300 dwelling units in the district, roughly half of these units in high rise structures, the other half in ground-oriented units. Design teams must find ways to accommodate this density on the site. At the same time, public preference for free hold dwellings and dwellings with private yards (even very small ones) is very strong.  Ways can and should be found to accommodate this natural housing preference.

    The site sits astride and directly uphill from a highly sensitive aquatic environment. Protecting this environment is of utmost importance. Based on the information provided, charrette participants should decide how best to protect and perhaps enhance the ecological function of the site and the adjacent Still Creek system.

    The commercial space requirements listed below are 200 percent higher per thousand residents than the average number of square feet commercial space per thousand throughout the region. These number suggest that most of the residents in the communities you propose will make their major purchases in the community and that the community will continue to attract the majority of its customers from the surrounding areas.

    Light industrial and office space requirements support the City of Burnaby’s desire to provide one job for every worker (18 - 65 years old) within Burnaby. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the site is an element in the larger urban landscape – a cell in a larger cultural and biophysical organism. The policies that inform the program for this site will guide urban development throughout the Province. Teams should seek ways to express their idea of this larger context in their design proposal.

    For the purposes of our charrette, the site has been broken into two areas. The first area is the 400 acres covered in the Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan. We have included an additional 190 acres to the south of the Brentwood Town Centre district. These lands occupy the zone between the BNR rail right-of-way on the north, and the centre line of Still Creek to the south. Industrial uses cover the majority of these additional acres. The remaining land is conservation land or unbuildable. The major ecological and engineering constraint associated with all lands south of the rail line is peat soil. Deep deposits of peat, saturated with groundwater, make these acres both difficult to build on (pilings required for all structures) and easily damaged. Charrette participants are to consider these lands in their proposals.

    Note that the City of Burnaby Planning Department does not anticipate, nor is it proposing changes to the zoning of these areas.  However, the Brentwood Plan includes a schematic plan for connecting the town centre with Still Creek and thence to the Burnaby Lake green zone.
    The specific program below only covers those acres considered in the Brentwood Town Centre Development Plan.  Teams are free to treat the additional 190 acres in one of the four following ways:  Back 
     
    1. Presume no changes south of the rail lines except to link the recreational and ecological systems of the Brentwood Town Centre to Still Creek.   
        

    2. Presume that some of the program requirements of this program could be “spread out” south of the tracks (either integrating with or displacing existing land uses). 

    3. Add intensity and density to these lands without reducing the intensity and density of the Brentwood Town Centre District (by locating dwelling units in this area that allow the total number of dwelling units to exceed the 9,300 figure cited below for example).   

    4. Propose that some or all of this area gradually revert back to green as part of an enlarged Burnaby Lake green zone.

     
    Land Use Allocations
     
    Commercial/Mixed Use  51 acres
    Residential 194 acres
    Industrial  10 acres
    Service Commercial 8 acres
    Public Open Space (includes school grounds)  37 acres
    Cemeteries (existing) 20 acres
    Road Rights-of-Way 80 acres
    Total Site Area: 400 acres                                    160 hectares
    Residents  
    Proposed Community Population 16,500
    Proposed Total Dwelling Units 9,300
    Residential Parking Standard 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit. 0.25 spaces per elderly or special needs unit.1 Parking can be on street or in surface lots.
    Public Transit  
      One light rail stop on Lougheed Highway is anticipated. The exact location of this stop is not definite and should be suggested. Frequent bus connections to this transit node from the north and south on Willingdon Street are available. Consideration should be given to the urban design of this important transit interchange.2
    Commercial  
    Commercial Space 3 1,500,000 sq. ft. (161,290 sq. m.) 
     90,000 sq. ft. (9,677 sq. m.)/ thousand 
    Commercial Parking Standard 750 sq. ft. or 70 sq. m. (3 spaces) per 1,000 sq. ft. retail. On street, off street, and enclosed parking.4 
    Light Industrial/Office  
    Light Industrial/Corporate Office Space 25,000 sq. ft. (2,3300 sq. m.) per 1,000 population.5 
    Service Office Space 16,000 sq. ft. (1,500 sq. m.) per 1,000 population.6
    Light Industrial/Corporate Office/Service Office Parking Standard 400 sq. ft. or 37 sq. m. (1.5 spaces) per 1,000 sq. ft. (or 90 sq. m.) office/light industrial 7
    Public Buildings  
    Elementary Schools Two Schools at 35,000 sq. ft. for 500 students, or one school at 70,000 sq. ft. for 1,000 students; and access to 8 acres (3.25 hectares) of outdoor recreation space.
    Childcare Facilities and Preschools  2,560 sq. ft. (240 sq., m.) interior space, 4,800 sq. ft. (445 sq. m.) exterior play space per 1,000 dwelling units.
    Community Centre and Library One at 36,000 sq. ft. (3,340 sq. m.) on street or off street parking for 32 cars.
    Fire Hall One at 11,000 sq. ft. (1,020 sq. m.).
    Town Hall/Public Offices 20,000 sq. ft. (1,860 sq. m.) for city and provincial satellite health, records, social, job training and other public functions. On street or off street parking for 25 cars. 
    Churches/Multi-Faith Centre with Assembly Hall One per 4,000 population at 10,000 sq. ft. (930 sq. m.).  On with Assembly Hall street or off street parking for 60 cars.  Parking can be shared           with non-competing use.8
       
    Notes  
     
     1 This number is one half the standard suburban residential parking requirement. One half standard is assumed to be appropriate for our purposes, given the “walking distance to services and transit” assumption underlying this charrette.  
    Back    
       
    2 We anticipate that this rail line will be constructed at grade and be similar to the Portland, Oregon system. As proposed, this rail line will be built within the existing Lougheed Highway right of way. Changes to this alignment may be proposed; however, it is nearly certain that this decision will not be reversed.  
    Back    

     3 This figure represents over 200% of the 42,000 sq. ft. (3,900 sq. m.) per 1,000 persons commercial floor space ratio that exists in our region at this time. Since the Brentwood District serves an area much larger than the 400 acre site, this is appropriate.  
    Back  
     4 This number is one half the standard suburban commercial requirement cited in Time Saver Standards for Site Planning. The UDI standard for retail parking is 5 to 6 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. (93 sq. m.) of commercial space. One half standard is assumed to be appropriate for our purposes, given the assumptions underlying this charrette (i.e., reduced dependence on automobiles, increased use of public transit).  
    Back    


     5 This number is generated as follows: assume one job per household (UDI) and 2.87 persons per household. The number of jobs for the entire district should be 350 per 1,000 population. Assume 35 % of jobs are in corporate office/light industrial. 0.35X350 = 123 jobs. 123 jobs X 200 sq. ft. (19 sq. m.) per worker = 25,000 sq. ft. (2,300 sq. m.) per 1,000 population.  
    Back    

     6 23% of 350 workers per 1,000 population = 80 persons at 200+ sq. ft. (19 sq. m.) per person = 16,000 sq. ft. (1,500 sq. m.) per 1,000 population.  
    Back 

     7 This number is one half the standard suburban light industrial/corporate office parking space requirement cited in Time Saver Standards for Site Planning. The UDI standard is 3.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of office. One half this standard is assumed appropriate for our purposes given the “walking distance to jobs or transit” assumption underlying this charrette.  
    Back    


     8 This number is an estimate of the typical number of churches per 1,000 population in our region, including all denominations.  
    Back 

    3    DESIGN CHARRETTE ADVISORY BOARD 

    The following individuals kindly agreed to serve as members on the Sustainable Urban Landscape Advisory Board. This group met at key points to advise on all aspects of the project plan, to select the case study site, to review and amend the design program, and to advise the Chair on appropriate follow-up activities subsequent to the charrette event.
     
    Mr. Michael Geller 
    Principal 
    The Geller Group 
    601 West Cordova 
    Vancouver, BC, V6B 1G1
    Mr. Hugh Kellas  
    Administrator, Policy Development 
    Strategic Planning Dept. GVRD 
    4330 Kingsway 
    Burnaby, BC, V5H 4G8 
     
    Ms. Penelope Gurstein 
    Assistant Professor 
    UBC School of Community and Regional Planning 
    6333 Memorial Road 
    Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2 
     
    Mr. Burton Leon  
    Manager, Real Estate and Policy 
    14245 - 56th Avenue 
    Surrey, BC, V3X 3A2
    Ms. Sue Haid  
    Ecosystem Planner 
    City of Burnaby 
    4949 Canada Way 
    Burnaby , B.C. V5G 1M2
    Mr. Patrick Mooney 
    Director & Associate Professor 
    UBC Landscape Architecture Program 
    6368 Stores Road 
    Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4 
     
    Mr. Sandy Hirshen  
    Director and Professor 
    UBC School of Architecture 
    6333 Memorial Road 
    Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2
    Mr. Kelvin Neufeld  
    Member, Legislative and Public Affairs Committee 
    Fraser Valley Real Estate Board 
    Surrey, BC, V3T 4W4 
     
     
    Mr. Kenji Ito 
    Assistant Director, Current Planning 
    City of Burnaby 
    4949 Canada Way 
    Burnaby , BC, V5G 1M2 
     
    Mr. Terry Partington  
    President, Partington Real Estate Advisors Ltd. 
    2580 Rosebery St 
    West Vancouver, BC,   V7V-2Z9 
    Mr. Erik Karlsen 
    Director, Special Projects 
    B.C. Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing 
    4th Floor, 800 Johnson Street 
    Victoria, BC, V7V 1X4
    Mr. John Robinson 
    Director, UBC Sustainable Development Research Institute 
    Professor, UBC School of Geography 
    B5-2202 Main Mall 
    Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4  Back 
     

    4    DESIGN CHARRETTE TEAM LEADERS
     
  • Bothwell
  • Byrd
  • Drohan
  • Harrington
  • Jacobs
  • Kelbaugh
  • Luymes
  • MacDonald
  • Mackay-Lyons
  • McGuinness
  • Pagani
  • Paterson
  • Perry
  • Prowler
  • Rockcastle
  • Rosenau
  • Worden
  • Stephanie Bothwell, Landscape Architect
    Stephanie is Director of the AIA Centre for Livable Communities. She has served on the faculties of Auburn University, Radcliffe College, and the Rhode Island School of Design. As the Senior Landscape Architect for the City of Boston’s neighbourhood redevelopment agency, she directed award winning planning, policy, program and implementation strategies for rebuilding communities across the city. Stephanie’s many activities include neighbourhood design seminars at Harvard for HUD, policy studies for the Fannie Mae Foundation, and design assistance to communities and institutions throughout the country. She is Chair of the Social Equity Task Force for the New Urbanism, and co-founder of the Urbanists of the South with Duany and Plater-Zyberk.
    Back

    Warren Byrd, Landscape Architect
    Warren has taught as well as chaired in the Department of Landscape Architecture at the University of Virginia for nineteen years. He has received many awards including The Council of Educators Award of Distinction, and the All University Outstanding Teacher Award from the University of Virginia. Warren has served on numerous landscape architecture juries throughout the United States and has lectured extensively. Warren currently shares a private practice in Charlottesville, Virginia that has collaborated on two nationally acclaimed, award-winning housing and landscape design competitions.
    Back

    Joyce Drohan, Architect
    Joyce Drohan is driven by an interest in architecture’s role in the larger urban context, which began while working with George Baird at the University of Toronto. She has had the opportunity to work with some of the country’s leading architecture/urban design firms, including James A. Murray, Architect, in Toronto, and Bruno Freschi Architects and Hotson Bakker Architects, of Vancouver. Her recent work includes: implementation of a revitalization study for Hastings Street in North Burnaby; additions, renovations and seismic upgrade to UBC’s Faculty of Education complex; a downtown plan for the City of Port Coquitlam; and a handbook for the design of building frontages on one of downtown Vancouver’s prime civic corridors, named Granville Street.
    Back

    Glenn Harrington, Landscape Architect
    Glenn Harrington is President of Harrington and Hoyle Ltd., a broad-based landscape architectural firm with offices in Markham and Cambridge, Ontario. He specializes in land reclamation, aggregate resource planning, and wetland creation, with a particular focus on stream restoration and naturalization. Glenn’s innovative projects have been featured in articles, presentations, and television productions, earning him recognition as a pioneer of bioengineering technology in Canada. As Chair of the Water Task Force, he has represented the Conservation Council of Ontario on numerous provincial and international water management panels.
    Back

    Peter Jacobs, Landscape Architect 
    Peter Jacobs is a professor of Landscape Architecture at the University of Montreal who has also taught at the Harvard Graduate School of Design, the Technion in Israel, the Universite de Paris, and the Universidad del Valle in Cali, Columbia. He has acted as Invited Scholar at the University of British Columbia and at Harvard University. Peter serves as an urban design consultant to the City of Montreal and has designed a number of award winning projects for urban open spaces. He has spent twenty years working with the Inuit in Northern Quebec on environmental impact assessments and community development projects.  Peter has also served on many Canadian and international scientific committees, including the five editorial committees he sits on now.
    Back

    Doug Kelbaugh, Architect
    Doug is Dean of Architecture and Urban Design at the University of Michigan. His designs have been published in over 100 books and magazines and featured in many exhibitions worldwide. Doug has taught and lectured at many schools of architecture throughout the US and Europe, including, most recently, as Professor of Architecture and Urban Design at the University of Washington. His accomplishments include co-editing The Pedestrian Pocket Book, co-chairing four national and international conferences on energy and design, organizing over a dozen national and international design charrettes and consulting on private and public development projects locally and abroad.
    Back

    Don Luymes, Landscape Architect
    Don has a BLA from UBC and a MLA from the University of Guelph. He practised as a landscape architect with firms in Vancouver, Guelph and Toronto — most notably with Hough Stansbury Woodland as a project manager. In 1992 Don was appointed to the faculty in Landscape Architecture at Penn State University where he taught and conducted research for four years, before returning to Vancouver to take a joint appointment in the Landscape Architecture Program and the Department of Forest Resources Management at UBC. Don has received awards for his design work, teaching and professional practice.  Don's interests lie in site design (particularly of parks, public landscapes and settlements), cultural aspects of designed places, and design criticism. He is currently involved in several projects that deal with issues of the urban/rural interface.
    Back

    Christopher MacDonald, Architect
    Christopher was educated at the University of Manitoba and the Architectural Association in London. He has been involved in architectural education in various capacities for the past twenty years as well as maintaining an engagement in practice. He is now the Director of the School of Architecture at the University of British Columbia. Work undertaken by his London partnership of MacDonald and Salter was widely exhibited and published through the 1980s, with work including participation in the IBA urban design project in West Berlin as well as numerous architectural scaled pieces.
    Back

    Brian MacKay-Lyons, Architect
    Brian is a practicing architect based in Nova Scotia, Canada, and a faculty member at the Technical University of Nova Scotia School of Architecture in Halifax. He received his BArch. from TUNS in 1978 and his MArch. from UCLA in 1982. Brian has received over forty awards for design, has been published internationally, and has taught at the Harvard Graduate School of Design.
    Back

    Bill McGuinness, Architect
    Bill graduated from UBC with degrees in Architecture (1989) and Sociology (1985). He worked in the architectural profession for two years with Blue Sky West and John Hollyfield, Architects. He then moved to the real estate development industry in which he has worked with the Adera Group of Companies in Vancouver. Bill is responsible for the design and approval of apartment and townhouse projects, and as such assembles and works with teams of architects, landscape architects, engineers and interior designers as required to bring about marketable new communities.
    Back

    Freda Pagani, Architect
    Freda is Director of Sustainability, Land and Building Services at the University of British Columbia and is responsible for the implementation of the UBC Sustainable Development Policy. During her previous role as Associate Director, Project Development in Campus Planning and Development, she initiated the C.K. Choi Building, on the UBC Campus, as a demonstration ‘green’ building and is now completing a Ph. D. in Resource Management and Environmental Studies at UBC which builds on her experience with that project. She has lectured widely and published papers on environmentally responsible design and has been selected as an adjudicator in architectural competitions with environmental criteria. Her deep commitment to the crucial issues of sustainability is expressed through her activities on committees and boards of several organizations devoted to promoting socially and environmentally responsible design.
    Back

    Douglas D. Paterson, Landscape Architect
    Doug obtained his BSc. from the University of Manitoba in 1964 and his MLA from the University of Michigan in 1967. He was a founding partner in a major interdisciplinary environmental planning firm in Western Canada called the Lombard North Group. In the past he served on the editorial advisory boards of Landscape Architecture Magazine and the Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning. Doug also acted as president of the Canadian Society of Landscape Architects, chaired the CSLA College of Fellows, and was Regional Director of the North American Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture. He has been teaching Landscape Architecture at UBC since 1980.
    Back

    Kim Perry, Landscape Architect
    Kim has been in private practice in Western Canada for the past twenty-four years since emigrating from Washington State in 1975. The work of his firm, Perry and Associates Inc.,
    in Vancouver, has focussed on public open space design of waterfronts, urban design and large scale site planning. Several of these projects have been recognized with awards from the Canadian Society of Landscape Architects, The Canadian Home-builders Association and the Waterfront Centre. From 1986 to 1991 Kim served as a sessional lecturer in the UBC Landscape Architecture Program. Recently, projects include the 900-acre Swan-e-set Bay Resort Community, the BC Packers lands in Steveston BC, and the Ridgeway Greenway in the city of Vancouver.
    Back

    Donald Prowler, Architect
    Donald is a practicing architect and member of the Architecture Faculties of both Princeton University and the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. He graduated cum laude from Princeton University in 1972 and received his MArch. from the University of Pennsylvania in 1975. His research, practice and teaching on sustainable and resource responsive architecture earned him the 1983 Progressive Architecture Research Award for his work on energy curriculum development for architecture schools, and positions such as Program Chairman of the 1983 International Daylighting Conference. He currently serves as Chairman of the Passive Solar Industries Council.
    Back

    Garth Rockcastle, Architect
    Garth received his BArch. at Pennsylvania State University in 1974 and his MArch. (Urban Design) at Cornell University in 1976. In 1989 Garth was awarded Excellence on the Waterfront Top Honor for the Cinncinati Gateway and in 1997 received the College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture’s Frederick J. Mann Award for Disciplinary Service. His professional accomplishments include the Sahara Wets Museum & Library, Las Vegas, NV, and the St. Anthony Phase IV, Minneapolis, MN.  Garth was Assistant, then Associate Professor at the College of Architecture and Landcsape Architecture in Minnesota from 1978 to 1991, and has been acting Professor and Head at CALA for the last eight years.
    Back

    W. Paul Rosenau, Planner
    Paul is the principal of EKISTICS, which consists of an energetic team of architects, landscape architects, planners and urban designers. Along with his associates, he is spearheading a rethinking of standard land development models and their underlying assumptions. Paul’s accomplishments include traditional town designs for Murray’s Corner in Langley, B.C., Kettle Valley Properties in Kelowna, B.C., Straiton Neighbourhood in the Sumas Mountains of Abbotsford, B.C., and Terwillegar Towne in Edmonton, Alberta.
    Back

    Bob Worden, Architect
    Bob is principal of Ramsay Worden Architects Ltd. in Vancouver. He has earned a reputation for innovative design in established contexts and neighbourhoods — design which both serves the needs of new users while also supporting the patterns and character of existing neighbourhoods. His work with both the development and planning community has covered a wide spectrum of medium density forms — from traditional rear lane subdivisions to fee simple rowhousing, to contemporary townhouse and apartment developments. Much of his effort is focused on the patterns of public/private integration, the primary goal being to create the intimacy and neighbourliness inherent in traditional neighbourhoods. Bob is currently involved the "Headwaters Project", another project of the James Taylor Chair, which is aimed at applying principles of sustainable site design.
    Back

     

       

    Contact Us
    JTC HOME